Norton residents fear eco-catastrophe in popular beauty spot

Steph Simpson and Norton residents in Mary Stevens Park where they fear tree felling will cause wildlife to disappear for years Steph Simpson and Norton residents in Mary Stevens Park where they fear tree felling will cause wildlife to disappear for years

PEOPLE in Norton are going batty about plans for a popular park which they say could cause an eco-catastrophe.

Mary Stevens Park, which attracts around 900,000 visitors every year, is the subject of an ambitious bid for lottery cash to pay for a host of improvements.

A planning application has been submitted as part of the bidding process, but a Norton woman claims tree felling could damage habitats which would take years to recover.

Steph Simpson, from Stanley Road, said: "These are mature habitats with established wildlife, we are going to be left with an empty, barren space for a number of years. I don't think that is right."

Mrs Simpson, aged 45, says she is concerned about bats which she says roost in trees earmarked for felling.

A planning report by URS Infrastructure and Environmental Limited says there is a high potential for roosting bats in the park but after two surveys they found no evidence to prove the animals were living in the park.

However the report goes on to say "the timing and amount of activity recorded in the parkland indicated that the site could contain roosts.

"In accordance with Bat Conservation Trust guidelines, any felling of trees or the removal of large limbs should be preceded by a thorough inspection by a suitably qualified bat worker."

Mrs Simpson is also worried by proposals to cut down a line of conifers which planners say enclose and restrict full access to the war memorial near the iconic main park gates on Worcester Street.

Heather Rogers, chair of the Friends of Mary Stevens Park, insisted the project is in its early stages and there is no threat to wildlife.

She said: "I am a great nature lover and I have no concerns. If we get the money we will have to concentrate on the gates.

"The war memorial needs to be more prominent, the Royal British Legion has asked for the whole area to be renovated, this would make it a very attractive feature."

Campaigners have already notched up their first success after the withdrawal of controversial plans to use silt dredged from the park's lake to build large mounds, called bunds, for spectators to stand on next to football pitches on neighbouring Swinford Common.

Anti-bund protestor, Joan Cosnett, from Severn Road, said: "It is a victory for common sense, people were very annoyed, this is definitely an achievement for the small person."

The planning application, which includes the long-awaited creation of a permanent cafe and refurbishment of the main gates, will be considered by Dudley's development control committee in the coming weeks.

Comments(5)

viktoria says...
10:08pm Wed 13 Mar 13

Oh yes a cafe would be welcome - it should help to generate even more litter in the park. Sometimes on a Sunday morning I count only 10-20 beer cans in this supposedly alcohol free park. Even with all the additional litter left behind by spectators of football matches on Oldswinford Common, there's not really enough to keep the Council park cleaners busy. So yes a healthy dose of additional litter from the cafe should help to secure their jobs. Bravo!

pete says...
12:38pm Thu 14 Mar 13

The perimeter of the park needs to be made secure otherwise it will continue as a nocturnal, al fresco pub.

Sadly the patrons invariably fail to take home their bottles and cans which continue and will continue to be a nuisance and eyesore until this is dealt with.

Jeremy44 says...
7:21am Wed 20 Mar 13

Nimbyism and non-sustainability at it's greatest. The pond hasn't been dredged for a generation, the public purse won't provide the money to dispose of the spoil to a tip and pay the new taxes, but a few locals complain about it being re-used in the locality thus avoiding the taxes, so assumedly NOTHING can be done to improve the water quality? Somebody ought to tell these people that they live in a community and the greater good comes before selfish individuals.
Do they not recognise the benefits of bunds and sound insulation on a Sunday morning so they WON'T hear the shouting and swearing?
Some of those trees should be felled, they were well past their best 20 years ago...the mistake was in not managing the replacements or carrying out selective removal. Either way, the park is shoddy and a world away from it's former glory....there was nothing for the now redundant parkies to do because they removed all the high maintenance but attractive features....and still the nimby's complain.

ozpat says...
6:11am Thu 21 Mar 13

well done jeremy44 it is nimbyism without doubt! no matter what is done it will upset them. If the complainants
are so upset then go and set up a neighbourhood watch rota go around the park! Bats first people second eh! come on use an ounce of common sense eh! try helping the situation guys than whinging pointlessly about it! nimbys who needs em eh!

semb100 says...
7:57pm Sat 23 Mar 13

The silt that would have formed the bunds is contaminated with heavy metals. Hardly the best seating for spectators especially any young children who are more at risk of exposure. In addition, the height of them at 1.4 metres would have meant that noise from spectators would be greatly increased as they would be above the height of residents fences. The plan should have been of concern to the footballers and spectators not just to the residents. There are other ways of dealing with the silt through proper treatment or a cheaper option would be placing in an area that is not heavily used by the public such as the common is.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree