Letters RSS Feed


Tories will immediately repeal the Hunting Act if elected

Most of the people of Stourbridge consider the hunting of wild animals with packs of dogs is unnecessary and extremely cruel.

It is very easy to focus on fox hunting but the Hunting Act banned all forms of hunting with packs of dogs.

Before this type of hunting was banned, deer were being hunted to exhaustion then torn apart by large packs of dogs.

Hares were captured and then released to be chased by dogs racing to catch them in organised hare coursing events. Few hares managed to escape the jaws of these very fast dogs.

There are concerned members of the public who have emailed the Conservative candidate, Margot James, to see why she wants the Hunting act to be repealed.

They will have received a standard reply prepared by Conservative HQ which has been sent out by Tory candidates in other areas.

It goes something like this: “I would not go fox hunting but I would not stop others doing it if they wish to”.

They are unlikely to get a mention of deer hunting or hare coursing which have conveniently been forgotten.

Neither will they get a mention of the fact that provision was made by hunters to encourage foxes to breed so they could then be hunted.

So much for the idea that we would be overrun by foxes if the hunters did not hunt them down with dogs.

Are we all too worried to leave our homes in case we will meet wild foxes, deer or hares on the rampage?

So now we know that a high priority of a future Tory government will be to repeal the Hunting Act.

This is what people will be doing if they vote to elect a Tory in Stourbridge.

Only Lynda Waltho has had the courage to come out openly and say she is opposed to hunting with packs of dogs.

Name and address supplied

Comments(8)

fairydaye says...
2:45pm Sun 25 Apr 10

typical false labour spin once again, the conservative leader has said he will give a free vote on the hunting act, it will then be up to the MP's who are elected to vote for or against the act. That is not repealing anything, that is giving the MP's a choice on what they want to do with this act. As I understand it, Margot James has merely said she would not go hunting, not nearly the same thing. But once again the Labour spin machine goes into falsehood mode. Something else for Gordon Brown to claim he has not authorised.

Maddy Westrop UKIP says...
6:38pm Sun 25 Apr 10

I can add a really fascinating bit of intelligence.

The BBC who have mostly ignored UKIP in its spotlight on Stourbridge, did offer to interview us if we spoke in favour of fox hunting and produced a horse and hound for the piece.

I refused this interview as irrelevant when the electorate needed to know our policies on more important matters - like the country being bankrupt, parliament being corrupt, the Lisbon treaty etc.

I was then told that Margot and the hunt had turned it down too. The BBC admitted they were pushing fox-hunting because Labour were interested. They want a class war agenda.

By the way, our policy is that it should be decided locally, by local referendum. It is the very least important policy I can think of.

Hillus says...
10:37am Mon 26 Apr 10

Fox Hunting may be considered cruel, but the fox does have a chance and if he's wiley enough, he'll get away.
On the other hand, female circumcision is profoundly cruel and the 'patient' has little chance to get away. Lefties should get their priorities right!

Linebacker II says...
9:24pm Tue 27 Apr 10

Whilst we're on the subject of "unnecessary and extremely cruel" killing, does Lynda's courage perchance extend to speaking up for the 200,000 unborn children who are slaughtered every year in this country, most of them perfectly healthy individuals?

patriotic citizen says...
12:13pm Wed 28 Apr 10

UK I P policy on fox hunting is to take the vote away from the MPs and give it to the public to decide on in a county by county binding referendum

pestobobber says...
1:47pm Wed 28 Apr 10

patriotic citizen wrote:
UK I P policy on fox hunting is to take the vote away from the MPs and give it to the public to decide on in a county by county binding referendum
Oh yeah that'll work. We'll have foxes legging it for the county line when they are being chased and of course the hunt will stop at the boundary because the dogs will somehow know that the democratic process has resolved they can go no further.

Hasn't this country got enough to worry about without raising this old chestnut?

The Mayor says...
6:26pm Wed 28 Apr 10

Now I'm no fan of Ms James, or Mr Cameron, but to be fair the Tories haven't promised to repeal the hunting act, just allow a free vote. So even if they are elected doesn't neccessarily mean the act will be repealed. On the other hand we were promised a free vote on Europe, which Cameron has reneged on so who knows what other promises will be broken....

The Villan says...
8:42am Thu 29 Apr 10

Let's be honest, most of the people of Stourbridge have greater things than fox hunting to worry about.
This is typical of politics to try and use smoke screens to change the focus of the real issues like immigration. Yesterday was proof enough and the final nail in Labour's coffin.
Liberals and the pc brigade are ruinung this once great country and it is time for the people to stand up and be counted.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree